Find a Jev implementation for agent routing, browser actions, coding tools or context compaction. See which decision Jev handles, how it is integrated and whether the source evidence has been reviewed.
The catalog includes 1,334 repository or integration records, 61 article or discussion records and 33 other resources. Repository links resolve to 1,332 unique GitHub repositories; a public link alone does not establish an open-source license.
JEV PROJECTS / ANSWER
What are Jev projects, and where should you start?
Jev projects apply Choice, Score, or Noul to bounded judgments such as routing, safety gates, browser actions, context compaction, and robot simulation. Start with the popular projects, then filter by use; use the model directory for local alternatives.
For deeper examples by task, inspect jev-git for a pinned Git-hook source review, Oh My Pi for an Agent integration, or jev-trader for dry-run versus live-trading boundaries. Stars signal attention, not correctness, reproducibility, or safety.
Which implementation fits your task?
These comparisons explain implementation differences at reviewed revisions. Follow each analysis to the primary evidence; star counts do not establish outcomes.
Browser versus desktop actions
The browser project builds operation and target tables from the DOM, using a text model for TYPE_TEXT. The macOS project merges OCR and accessibility elements and handles off-screen controls and post-input checks.
Choose by observation interface first: a web DOM is not interchangeable with native desktop controls. Neither establishes unattended reliability across arbitrary sites or apps.
Pi context compaction
The joelhooks version filters model context while retaining the JSONL transcript and rebuilding branch state from a decision ledger. The joslynSmall version puts tool evidence into a compaction summary, whose total budget still limits retention.
For auditability, inspect transcript storage and branch replay. For evidence inside a summary, inspect budget-exhaustion behavior. “Never loses original text” is not a property shared by all compaction approaches.
Search-result reranking
memsearch uses per-candidate Noul relevance judgments, retains candidate text and propagates failures. Kody uses a 0–3 Score in batches of eight and returns the hybrid order after low mean confidence or failure.
Decide which layer owns failures and which quantity drives ordering. Thresholds in source are author policies, not accuracy calibrated on your retrieval data.
HOT / 10
Popular Jev projects
Ten widely followed projects spanning browser automation, context compaction, trading, official skills, computer use, review, orchestration, and data.
Converts strategy questions to System One requests and normalizes native answers to the project’s result format.
→Allows Jev or other model backends to be used in the same research workflow.
Stars / Forks
63,699 / 11,169
Issues
167
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-22
Source note
The author describes an educational research prototype that currently does not execute trades. It is not an official Jev adapter, a zero-hallucination system, or evidence of profitability. This site has not backtested it.
An optional TypeSafe provider for Composio that uses Jev to choose among tools and bounded argument options.
ϟ JEV · Decision point
Uses a routing Choice, Noul action gates and finite argument questions, then returns abstain, partial or call. Missing required arguments remain explicit; destructive tool calls retain a confirmation requirement.
→Separates selecting a tool from binding its arguments and executing it, allowing callers to handle no-action, uncertainty and partial inputs explicitly.
multilanguage-sdkllm-routing-costtyped-decisions
An optional TypeSafe provider for Composio that uses Jev to choose among tools and bounded argument options.
Uses a routing Choice, Noul action gates and finite argument questions, then returns abstain, partial or call. Missing required arguments remain explicit; destructive tool calls retain a confirmation requirement.
→Separates selecting a tool from binding its arguments and executing it, allowing callers to handle no-action, uncertainty and partial inputs explicitly.
Stars / Forks
30,300 / 4,819
Issues
96
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-23
Source note
Pinned provider decision code reviewed, not a live Composio run. The adapter's thresholds and required-confirmation flag are application rules; they do not prove safe execution unless the caller enforces them.
The TypeSafe provider in AI SDK lets TypeScript applications call Jev through the shared evaluate interface.
ϟ JEV · Decision point
The TypeSafe evaluation provider maps AI SDK boolean questions to native Noul and converts the responses back. Native Choice/Score confidence is retained in providerMetadata.typesafe.confidence rather than the generic answer object.
→Allows a TypeScript AI SDK application to use a common evaluation interface while keeping text generation and finite decisions separate.
multilanguage-sdktyped-decisionsanthropic
The TypeSafe provider in AI SDK lets TypeScript applications call Jev through the shared evaluate interface.
The TypeSafe evaluation provider maps AI SDK boolean questions to native Noul and converts the responses back. Native Choice/Score confidence is retained in providerMetadata.typesafe.confidence rather than the generic answer object.
→Allows a TypeScript AI SDK application to use a common evaluation interface while keeping text generation and finite decisions separate.
Stars / Forks
26,922 / 5,180
Issues
1,462
License
Not specified
Last commit
2026-09-23
Source note
Pinned adapter source reviewed. No live inference was run; native and AI SDK response fields differ, so this integration is not evidence that a generic evaluation probability equals TypeSafe confidence.
Reads DOM or supported visual-region descriptions and returns a supplied candidate action ID.
→Provides Python and TypeScript loops with separate offline and live checks.
Stars / Forks
26,156 / 1,813
Issues
1,057
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-24
Source note
The Jev integration is a public-preview example, not the entire Cua framework or CUA-S1. Offline fixture checks do not establish live model performance. README and integration source reviewed at a fixed commit; not independently run or benchmarked by this site.
Chooses an action and its matching DOM element in one request; a text model generates input text.
→Separates UI choices, text generation, and browser execution so each step can be inspected.
Stars / Forks
19,456 / 384
Issues
36
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-18
Source note
The author reports a median of about 7.1 seconds on one Google Flights task, with three runs per setup. Initial navigation is excluded; this is not a general Agent benchmark and was not independently retested.
Deep Searcher includes a frozen-query evaluation of Jev as a search-stopping judge; this experiment is separate from the full research agent.
ϟ JEV · Decision point
Jev judges enough_information from the main query and accumulated intermediate context; code compares stopping decisions under a bounded round protocol.
→Makes stopping behavior and call traces inspectable; the protocol explicitly does not score final-answer quality.
search-retrievalevaluation-benchmarks
Deep Searcher includes a frozen-query evaluation of Jev as a search-stopping judge; this experiment is separate from the full research agent.
Jev judges enough_information from the main query and accumulated intermediate context; code compares stopping decisions under a bounded round protocol.
→Makes stopping behavior and call traces inspectable; the protocol explicitly does not score final-answer quality.
Stars / Forks
8,282 / 803
Issues
55
License
Apache-2.0
Last commit
2026-09-22
Source note
Fixed-version documentation and implementation material were inspected on 2026-10-24. No 100-query comparison or live API was run. The evaluation directory does not prove the main application enables this path by default.
Five Noul dimensions check cached-answer compatibility; the evaluator returns their minimum score, and a request failure returns zero.
→Prevents a strong task match from averaging away weak format or freshness compatibility, without claiming to verify the answer’s truth.
Stars / Forks
8,201 / 597
Issues
101
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-22
Source note
Fixed-version documentation and implementation material were inspected on 2026-10-24. No cache service or live request was run. The evaluator’s float conversion is not an independent calibration or correctness guarantee.
Separately judges whether a tool call and its full output are still needed; code keeps, truncates or drops them.
→Avoids rewriting paths, commands and errors into a new summary.
Stars / Forks
6,653 / 387
Issues
81
License
MIT
Last commit
2026-09-17
Source note
Requests are split to fit budgets, rather than always using one call. Pruning can remove useful context; the animation is not a live API benchmark. README and integration source reviewed at a fixed commit; not independently run or benchmarked by this site.
Tiny Jev-like decision head built atop Qwen2.5-0.5B that can be trained and run locally on Apple Silicon MacBooks.
ϟ JEV · Decision point
Attaches a parallel decision head to an open 0.5B model to answer discrete questions directly from token activations.
→Provides a small local decision-model architecture and probes for packed-versus-separate questions, option order and calibration. Hosted teacher calls for data collection remain a separate network and cost dependency.
evaluation-benchmarkstyped-decisions
Tiny Jev-like decision head built atop Qwen2.5-0.5B that can be trained and run locally on Apple Silicon MacBooks.
Attaches a parallel decision head to an open 0.5B model to answer discrete questions directly from token activations.
→Provides a small local decision-model architecture and probes for packed-versus-separate questions, option order and calibration. Hosted teacher calls for data collection remain a separate network and cost dependency.
Stars / Forks
6,183 / 339
Issues
30
License
Apache-2.0
Last commit
2026-09-24
Source note
The pinned README and hosted-teacher adapter were read. This site did not train the student or reproduce its calibration figures. Local inference capability does not mean every data-generation step is offline or free.
An on-device conversation copilot for WeChat, QQ, X, and Feishu that reads the visible chat, suggests replies, and fills the input field only when asked. It reads the screen without hooking or modifying the host app; the user still decides whether to send.
BASIC LISTING
This listing includes an overview and project link; a reviewed Jev decision point is not yet available.
→Open the project link to review its source material and implementation.
An on-device conversation copilot for WeChat, QQ, X, and Feishu that reads the visible chat, suggests replies, and fills the input field only when asked. It reads the screen without hooking or modifying the host app; the user still decides whether to send.
BASIC LISTING
This listing includes an overview and project link; a reviewed Jev decision point is not yet available.