How we review content
We separate official definitions, community project facts, and editorial interpretation so important claims can be traced to public evidence.
- 01
Prefer primary sources
Model capabilities and interfaces are checked against TypeSafe documentation, public releases, and source code. Third-party summaries are not presented as official claims.
- 02
Pin source evidence
The project radar prefers links to specific files, commits, or stable evidence. “Reviewed” means public evidence was checked; it is not a performance, safety, or commercial endorsement.
- 03
State uncertainty
Anything not confirmed by public evidence is labeled accordingly. Confidence, thresholds, and example outputs are never described as guaranteed accuracy.
- 04
Protect researched search language
Human-reviewed titles, keywords, and terminology are maintained separately and cannot be overwritten by automated translation. Locales without native review remain noindex.
- 05
Accept corrections
Corrections to ownership, licenses, data, or interpretation can be submitted with evidence through the contact page. Confirmed corrections are reflected in the page and data snapshot.